| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | reiner peterke <zedaardv(at)drizzle(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rod K <rod(at)23net(dot)net>, pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [0.0] Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work |
| Date: | 2004-07-30 16:32:45 |
| Message-ID: | 410A782D.7080907@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-php |
> i'm trying to test an idea. i know what i sent doesn't do much, but i
> try out ideas before i go too far to make sure i understand what i think
> i do
> in my 'real life' i work with oracle. i like the idea of explicitly
> telling the database when i'm done. i want to be able to trap errors
> and rollback if necessary. also to give someone the choice of saving
> the work or not. i know there are things i can do to create the similar
> effect,
> create the sql, then when i'm ready submit it to the database.
Oracle doesn't do what you want either. I'm afraid you have a
fundamental misunderstanding of how the HTTP process works.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bruce | 2004-07-30 16:35:14 | Re: [0.0] Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-07-30 16:31:30 | Re: [0.2] getting transactions to work |