| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
| Date: | 2004-07-27 10:41:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4106316D.2000605@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett wrote:
> I suppose so. I'd point out that the NIO byteorder info is really just
> an optimization hint -- the rest of the NIO API is byteorder agnostic,
> regardless of what the native byteorder is.
>
The rest of the NIO API is not agnostic. A java.nio.ByteBuffer is big
endian by default and can be changed using the order method. This is the
mechanism you'd use to implement I/O that can handle either endian type.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-07-27 11:28:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-27 10:10:57 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-07-27 11:28:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-27 10:10:57 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |