Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend
Date: 2004-07-25 20:23:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
>>Would you use a kill operation in the way you describe above 
>>if you knew
>>that it had, say, a 1% chance of causing a database-wide PANIC 
>>each time
>>you used it?

Seems there's the need for some connection killing functionality. If 
it's not present, the whole cluster needs to be shut down, which makes 
it unavailable with 100 % chance.

If there's a .00001 % chance it *corrupts* the cluster, the function is 
not acceptable. But iff it's a good chance to keep the cluster running, 
it's worth having it (and should be used sensibly).


In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-07-25 20:58:01
Subject: [subxacts] Savepoint syntax
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-07-25 18:03:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group