Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: V3 protocol + DECLARE problems

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: V3 protocol + DECLARE problems
Date: 2004-07-21 21:20:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Kris Jurka wrote:

> I see where you are going in the WITH HOLD case, I don't see how this 
> extends to scrollable cursors without other major changes as the Execute 
> protocol message assumes forward only operation.

Use FETCH, or a protocol change. If we're using DECLARE anyway, it's not 
too much extra pain to teach it about FETCH too.

This is all some time away anyway, I was just verifying my initial 
assumptions when I hit the DECLARE problem.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-21 22:42:50
Subject: Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2004-07-21 21:07:34
Subject: Re: V3 protocol + DECLARE problems

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Blaine SimpsonDate: 2004-07-21 21:47:56
Subject: Re: JDBC connection issue
Previous:From: Phil MoorsDate: 2004-07-21 21:16:22
Subject: Re: SSL URL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group