| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support. |
| Date: | 2004-07-16 08:59:16 |
| Message-ID: | 40F798E4.6050703@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote:
> I've done this for the core driver, but I'm kind of stuck on how to get
> this to work for the various DataSource implementations. These don't
> have the same multi-version architecture and users are required to
> know what JDK they are dealing with in their configuration.
I have to admit I haven't looked too hard at this area, but I don't
understand why we need versioned implementations of DataSource at all.
Don't they all end up delegating to the Driver to create the connection
anyway? I couldn't see anything in the JDBC3 implementations that seems
JDBC3-specific..
We currently use the jdbc2.optional datasource implementations under a
1.4 JDK, for historical reasons more than anything. But it appears to
work fine.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-07-16 09:38:39 | Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support. |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-07-16 08:43:46 | Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support. |