Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.
Date: 2004-07-16 03:16:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Kris Jurka wrote:
> The new V3 protocol code has removed support for compiling with a 1.1 JDK, 
> but we still have the core implementation split between jdbc1 and jdbc2 
> classes.  Should be combine these all into jdbc2 or is there a reason to 
> keep these separate?

That sounds reasonable unless there's some reason you'd want to run 
JDK1.2 + JDBC1 (I can't think of one).

> To add JDK1.5 support I originally considered an ant conditional
> compilation method, but that was really ugly.  Another idea I have is to
> create a jdbc3g subdirectory (JDBC3 w/ Generics) that wouldn't house any
> implementation (AbstractJdbc3g* classes), but would just have the classes
> to offer the API desired by the 1.5 JDK.

That works.


In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Dario V. FassiDate: 2004-07-16 05:27:04
Subject: Re: Very strange Error in Updates
Previous:From: Dario V. FassiDate: 2004-07-16 03:13:01
Subject: Re: Very strange Error in Updates - Worst than ever !

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group