Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Date: 2004-07-12 20:35:36
Message-ID: 40F2F618.5030800@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> that he "Used Daniel's Elephant", which I believe refers to Daniel
> Lundin, though I don't recognize that name. Note also that that page
> indicates that those logo's are for the community, not the corporation,
> which in essence would mean that the company has posted that the logo is
> for the community.

I think the real problem is that while the community elephant and the
postgresql, inc. elephant is the same, there is a unintended endorsement
by the community to postgresql, inc.

This is by no means a slam on postgresql, inc but it seems the community
has always tried to be very business neutral and per Marc's own email
the elephants should be different.

Sincerely,

Joshua D> Drake

>
>
> Robert Treat

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-12 20:49:18 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-07-12 20:29:10 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant