(Fwd)

From: suspect(dot)files(at)anr(dot)state(dot)vt(dot)us
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: (Fwd)
Date: 2004-06-25 18:13:55
Message-ID: 40DC3323.19193.D2D488@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: 25 Jun 2004 11:41:22 +0200
From: Ago <ago(at)nmb(dot)it>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Send reply to: Ago <ago(at)nmb(dot)it>
Subject: [GENERAL]

I have a PHP script that runs this query on Postgresql 7.2.3. Once it
inserts the record in the e_catalog table it takes the id value and
then inserts it in the e_catalog_cache table, the two tables must
have
the same rows and values.
I thought rhat inside a transaction block the subquery SELECT
MAX(id)
FROM e_catalog was safe from concurrent same transactions, that
is
the id value from SELECT MAX(id) FROM e_catalog was exactly
that one
inserted in the previous statement, but reading some threads in this
mailing list I have some doubt now.
This is the query:

BEGIN WORK;
INSERT INTO e_catalog(id, name, descr) VALUES
(nextval('sequence'),
'$Name', '$Descr');

INSERT INTO e_catalog_cache(id, name, descr) VALUES
((SELECT MAX(id)
FROM e_catalog), '$Name', '$Descr');

COMMIT WORK;

Thanks.

---------------------------(end of
broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists
at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

------- End of forwarded message -------

Attachment Content-Type Size
- application/octet-stream 1.0 KB

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.N.Other 2004-06-26 04:06:19 postgresql web site gone missing!!!
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2004-06-25 18:13:46 Re: Query inside transaction