Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: use new List API names

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: use new List API names
Date: 2004-05-30 20:09:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> I thought llast() and length() were going away too?

For llast(), I decided to keep it around: it is nicely symmetric 
with linitial(), and it makes any code that actually needs the last 
value in a list significantly more readable. Since it's a macro 
there's no runtime cost.

I had thought about keeping length() around, but on second thought I 
don't see why we ought to. I'll replace it with list_length() and 
post an updated patch.


In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-05-30 21:09:44
Subject: Re: use new List API names
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-05-30 16:03:08
Subject: Re: use new List API names

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group