| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Subject: | Re: Big problem | 
| Date: | 2004-05-24 18:37:11 | 
| Message-ID: | 40B240D7.2070205@bigfoot.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> 
>>Hmmm - I agree it's difficult, but somehow I think it's something we 
>>should do.  Just imagine if some major user of postgres did it - they'd 
>>be screaming blue murder...
> 
> 
> Shrug.  Superusers can *always* shoot themselves in the foot in Postgres.
> Try "delete from pg_proc", for instance.  This sounds right up there
> with the notion of preventing a Unix superuser from doing "rm -rf /".
Why not simply add a flag "undeleteable" applicable only to super user?
In this way is enough in the initdb fase create the postgres user as
undeleateable.
I think this is resonable.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-05-24 18:40:52 | Re: Optimizer bug?? | 
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-24 18:23:31 | Re: Optimizer bug?? |