Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR Phase 2 - Design Planning
Date: 2004-04-28 17:35:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 05:00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>What if we added transaction id to log_line_prefix?  The user could then
>>log all queries and find the xid where they want to stop, but of course
>>that assumes they have enabled such logging, and they have access to the
>Good thinking.
>I'll have a look at this and come back to you.

log_statement triggered logging happens very early in the process - if 
you are logging them all it happens before the statements are even 
parsed. Would we have an xid to log sensibly at that stage?

Perhaps with log_min_duration_statment = 0 we would (i.e. log statements 
when finished rather than when started).



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mark HarrisonDate: 2004-04-28 18:18:47
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?
Previous:From: scott.marloweDate: 2004-04-28 17:07:26
Subject: Re: How to Welcome Windows Users (was Re: 7.5 features)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group