On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm thinking an array, in case we want to make other tablespace cost
> parameters in the future.* Or, better, whatever structure we're
> currently using for ROLEs.
>
> (* for example, if someone does manage a filesystem with a separate
> cache space per mount, then we'd want effective_cache_size to be
> tablespace-based as well)
Still far from convinced on that one. But effective_io_concurrency
should be included even in the first pass.
--
greg