Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts
Date: 2009-08-27 00:27:42
Message-ID: 407d949e0908261727h14c01ecagfe6fcebce9c650b4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So with this change you would have the startup script not remove the
>> lock file?
>
> Huh?  The startup script shouldn't *ever* remove the lock file.
> That's been true all along, and this doesn't change it.

I thought that was the whole difference between using pg_ctl to start
up and the initscripts. Since the init script knows it's starting
something up at boot time it knows any lock files are left over and
might contain the pid of one of the other processes the init script
starts.

I did have another thought. It could compare the time from uptime to
the timestamp on the lock file. If the server's been restarted since
the time in the lock file then it must be stale. uhm. unless clock's
been changed...

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-08-27 00:35:54 Re: BUG #4996: postgres.exe memory consumption keeps going up
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-27 00:24:00 Re: MySQL Compatibility WAS: 8.5 release timetable, again