| From: | Kristo Kaiv <kristo(dot)kaiv(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Ike de Oliveira <fike(at)midstorm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL. |
| Date: | 2007-05-31 06:45:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4073A396-4641-41A5-83B8-3C190DB772D0@skype.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi!
We have a PostgreSQL cluster that is runnign on tens of server on
different colocations.
Failovers / switchovers between colocations can be done per server.
Uptime has been
>99.9%. All the software is opensource and has gone through
intensive live testing.
Our cluster is running on:
skytools:
* londiste (replica)
* pgq (generic queueing system)
* walmgr (wal replica manager)
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/skytools/
plproxy (remote calls language)
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/plproxy/
pgbouncer
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbouncer/
BR,
Kristo
On 30.05.2007, at 22:42, Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I need solution to PostgreSQL for High Available, originally
> was 99,7% but considering the current necessities, change percentual
> to 99,99%. I think in solution probability pgpool-2 or Heartbeat +
> GFS. The PostgreSQL servers will be in different physical places.
>
> Suggestions?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
> --
> Fernando Ike
> http://www.midstorm.org/~fike/weblog
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-31 14:01:53 | Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs after restoring from backup |
| Previous Message | adey | 2007-05-31 05:30:20 | Re: High Avaliable in the PostgreSQL. |