Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Date: 2004-03-24 15:54:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Back on December 1st I wrote:

> I suspect this work is actually a bit premature, and would best be 
> done after we have a working Win32 postmaster. After all, you can 
> happily run postgres without ever calling pg_ctl - it's a convenience 
> rather than an absolute necessity (unlike initdb). On Windows, 
> production users probably wouldn't use it at all - they would use the 
> service manager, I should think.

Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl 
in C?

(And has anyone looked at putting in service manager hooks?)



In response to

  • pg_ctl at 2003-12-01 17:47:29 from Andrew Dunstan


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-24 16:15:08
Subject: Re: pg_ctl
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-24 03:48:18
Subject: Re: default psql to localhost on platforms without unix domain

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group