| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |
| Date: | 2006-09-29 21:55:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4027.1159566923@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> O.k. further on this.. the crashing is happening quickly now but not
> predictably. (as in sometimes a week sometimes 2 days).
OK, that seems to eliminate the GetTickCount-overflow theory anyway.
> That log entry is the last (of consequence) entry before the machine says:
> 2006-09-28 16:40:36.921 LOG: received fast shutdown request
Oh? That's pretty interesting on a Windows machine, because AFAIK there
wouldn't be any standard mechanism that might tie into our homegrown
signal facility. Anyone have a theory on what might trigger a SIGINT
to the postmaster, other than intentional pg_ctl invocation?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mark | 2006-09-29 21:59:17 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-29 21:41:35 | Re: Per-database search_path |