Re: Re: [HACKERS] OSDN Database conference report (long)

At 11:08 AM 11/3/2000 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>"Rob S." <rslifka(at)home(dot)com> writes:
> >> ... I thought this pointed up the need we've
> >> been aware of for awhile to overhaul our error reporting.
>
> > I'm not sure exactly where the error checking comes in. I've been using
> > Postgres in two places - at home (Apache/Tomcat) and at work (Apache/iASP)
> > for the last 8 months or so. The only gripe I have with error messages is
> > that they could be more specific. "Error near <some character that occurs
> > 20+ times in the query>" is usually pretty useless =) Otherwise, I can't
> > recall a single time where I said, "man that message should be more clear".

As opposed to SQL server which tends to be extrememly cryptic and goes out
of it's way to hide information from you. Once I was importing some records
from a text file and it kept stopping in the middle with a dialog box that
said "overflow" and that's all. It would not tell me the line number or the
field it was having trouble with. What I did was to recreate the structure
of the table in postgres and try to import into there. Postgres told me
that I had an invalid date on line number whatever. I guess you cna say I
used postgres as a debugging tool for ms-sql server.

BTW did you know that it's impossible to store dates before 1700 on ms-sql
server? It's datetime datatype will not support older dates.
----------------------------------------------
Tim Uckun
Mobile Intelligence Unit.
----------------------------------------------
"There are some who call me TIM?"
----------------------------------------------