| From: | Charles Tassell <ctassell(at)isn(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 1999-12-26 22:06:29 |
| Message-ID: | 4.2.0.58.19991226175253.009ab960@mailer.isn.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 10:27 PM 12/25/99, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>[snip]
> > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility.
>
>I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are
>working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
>Anything else?
Replication would be nice, or some other form of clustering so the load can
be easily split among multiple PostGres servers. My personal pet peeves
are the difficulty of the backup/restore process (well, it's not really
difficult, it just takes a while) and the 8k query limit. Also, the
ability to restrict CREATE [ TABLE | INDEX | SEQUENCE ...] would be nice.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Fischer | 1999-12-26 22:30:44 | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Thomas Reinke | 1999-12-26 21:30:00 | Reliabilty, was [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |