On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> HOWEVER, I do believe this is an issue we could live with for 9.0 if
>>> it's going to lead to a whole lot of additional debugging of SR. But if
>>> it's an easy fix, it'll avoid a lot of complaints on pgsql-general.
>> I think that the latter statement is right.
> Though we've not reached consensus on smart shutdown during
> recovery yet, I wrote the patch that changes its behavior:
> shut down the server (including the startup process and the
> walreceiver) as soon as all read-only connections have died.
> The code is also available in the 'replication' branch in
> my git repository.
> And, let's discuss whether something like the attached patch
> is required for v9.0 or not.
I rebased the patch to HEAD. Is the patch still required for 9.0?
If not, I'd remove the open item of the smart shutdown during
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-03-30 09:14:48|
|Subject: pending patch: Re: Streaming replication and pg_xlogfile_name()|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-03-30 08:52:19|
|Subject: Streaming replication document improvements|