On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> Updated application name patch, including a GUC assign hook to clean
>> the application name of any unsafe characters, per discussion.
> Applied with assorted editorialization. There were a couple of
> definitional issues that I don't recall if we had consensus on:
Why doesn't application_name appear in postgresql.conf.sample?
That is expected to be set from only libpq?
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Ron Mayer||Date: 2009-11-30 01:03:41|
|Subject: Re: cvs chapters in our docs|
|Previous:||From: Florian G. Pflug||Date: 2009-11-30 00:16:43|
|Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4|