| From: | vishal saberwal <vishalsaberwal(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ref: BUG#1321: SSL error: sslv3 alert handshake failure |
| Date: | 2005-08-25 03:39:10 |
| Message-ID: | 3e74dc250508242039cebfe8b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Yes you are right again tom ...
When i checked, i found that fedora core came with postgresql 7.4 ...
hence the reason for my SSL not working ...
Installed 8.0.1 on the client and yes it works ...
Guess i can stay on 8.0.1 until we get 8.0.4 ... (is it right for me
to ask what data-loss you are talking about) ...
thanks again,
vish
On 8/24/05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> vishal saberwal <vishalsaberwal(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I agree with what you said ... They considered 8.0.1 as a stable
> > version they can rely on (but i believe i can propose a change now
> > after this SSL fix in 8.0.3) ...
>
> Well, actually, I just looked through the CVS logs, and I do not
> see any changes related to SSL between 8.0.1 and 8.0.3; the only
> significant changes in libpq at all were fixes to make Kerberos
> work on Windows.
>
> So I'm wondering if the 8.0.3 update was irrelevant, and the important
> point was just to get the client-side key files installed correctly.
>
> As far as fighting with your management goes, you might want to wait
> a week and then lean on them to update to 8.0.4, instead. There are
> a couple of data-loss risks fixed for 8.0.4.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-25 04:18:47 | Re: Ref: BUG#1321: SSL error: sslv3 alert handshake failure |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-25 03:19:19 | Re: Ref: BUG#1321: SSL error: sslv3 alert handshake failure |