| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Filip Gospodinov <f(at)gospodinov(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fix pkg-config file for static linking |
| Date: | 2021-09-06 08:30:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3d083444-0fc8-b873-ecf1-d90d72558b2e@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05.09.21 21:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Makes sense. I think we could do it without hardcoding those library
>> names, as in the attached patch. But it comes out to the same result
>> AFAICT.
>
> This has been pushed, but the CF entry is still open, which is
> making the cfbot unhappy. Were you leaving it open pending
> pushing to back branches as well? I'm not sure what the point
> of waiting is --- the buildfarm isn't going to exercise the
> troublesome scenario.
I noticed another fix that was required and didn't get to it until now.
It's all done and backpatched now. CF entry is closed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-09-06 08:59:38 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-09-06 08:19:34 | RE: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables |