Re: chained transactions

On 05/04/2018 10:35, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 15/03/18 18:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> From 517bc6d9fefdee9135857d9562f644f2984ace32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
>>> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 09:33:53 -0500
>>> Subject: [PATCH v1 6/8] Turn transaction_isolation into GUC enum
>>>
>>> XXX no idea why it was done the way it was, but this seems much simpler
>>> and apparently doesn't change any functionality.
>> Enums are recent -- 52a8d4f8f7e2, only 10 years old, and the commit
>> didn't convert all cases, leaving some for later. Funnily enough,
>> default_transaction_isolation was changed afterwards by ad6bf716baa7 but
>> not this one ... I guess "later" is now upon us for it.
>
> With this patch, this stops working:
>
> set transaction_isolation='default';
>
> Other than that, +1 on this patch. I haven't looked closely at the rest
> of the patches yet.

Based on this, I have committed this part of the patch series.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services