Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 signal code - first try

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 signal code - first try
Date: 2004-01-08 22:53:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Merlin Moncure wrote:

>Also, all signals will be run FIFO.  Is this acceptable?  (maybe a unix
>expert could chime in here).

Stevens' APUE (if you do any Unix programming and you don't have this 
book, run don't walk and get it ;-) ) says: "POSIX.1 does not specify 
the order in which signals are delivered to a process. The Rationale for 
POSIX.1 does suggest, however, that signals related to the current state 
of the process, such as SIGSEGV, be delivered before other signals."

AFAIK we are not using any of the signals he is referring to in the 
second sentence, so FIFO should be fine.



In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-01-08 23:38:00
Subject: Re: Win32 signal code - first try
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-01-08 22:17:27
Subject: Re: Win32 signal code - first try

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group