Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.4 and Pygresql

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gerhard Häring <lists(at)ghaering(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, darcy(at)PyGreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 and Pygresql
Date: 2003-12-07 22:20:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
>> You know, I expect that sort of FUD from commercial enterprises that 
>> have something to gain by switching people to their product. 
> I've recommended pyPgSQL *or* psycopg, because I honestly believe that 
> they're better options for developers (a lot more complete, and 
> actively developed, and bug reports/patches don't get lost). So it's 
> not true that I only tried to promote the project I'm involved in.

It is our experience that pyPgSQL and psycopg are much better supported 
than the PyGreSQL. We have tried PyGreSQL in the past and found it to be
lacking. I seriously doubt, regardless of D'Arcy's biased that he was 
presenting a case based on just involvement of himself in a project. 
we have developed over 100,000 dollars worth of code in psycopg without 


Joshua D. Drake

Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC - S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming, shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com -

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Paul TillesDate: 2003-12-08 17:53:22
Subject: ecpg in Version 7.4
Previous:From: NKDate: 2003-12-07 00:49:40
Subject: Help! Parser Stage: Get The Columns Of the Table

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group