| From: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | jm(at)poure(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
| Date: | 2003-11-17 19:01:01 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB91AED.6030703@fmonkey.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>Yes, it is perfectly possible. But, there are so many-many build-time
>depencies in wxWindows. Listing them all is quite difficult.
>
>
Really? Am I missing something, or would this line suffice (granted,
this is the RH line, but...):
BuildRequires: gtk2-devel, libjpeg-devel, libpng-devel, libtiff-devel
>On the other hand, the upcoming stable version of wxWindows 2.5.1 will provide
>a new set of RPMs. These "new" RPMs are very well designed. They include both
>buildtime and binary dependencies.
>
>Personaly, I think it is a waste of time to invest in the wxGTK2ud direction
>when a new set of RPMs is coming along. If you think the converse, do not
>hesitate to submit a patch and I will apply it immediately. This is free
>software... You are free to do what you want...
>
>
So are we going to be using the official wxWindows RPMs from now on?
Are we going to run into any problems since we currently use a build of
wxWindows that differs from the "official" build?
ahp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-11-17 20:04:03 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
| Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-11-17 18:56:21 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |