Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Email signature

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Aleksander Kmetec <aleksander(dot)kmetec(at)intera(dot)si>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Email signature
Date: 2003-11-14 06:40:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Hi Aleksander,

Yep, there's no professional IT person that I know of that uses HTML 
email.  Most consider it *rude* to be sent HTML email, or that the 
person sending it was clueless (or made a mistake in their settings 

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>I understend your concerns, but looking through my inbox I can see that
>>>everyone, except a small number of fellow programmers, is using html format
>>>for sending messges. It seems to be the standard here and plaintext
>>>messages are pretty much out of the question for business communication.
>>>I'm not kidding - sometimes I even get asked why I keep replying in
>>>plaintext! :)
>>Ok, different from here, then.   In California, plaintext is still the
>>standard for anything but advertisements.
> Same here ... my spam filters pick up nicely on HTML email and shuffle it
> off to where its supposed to ... no mans land :)
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2003-11-14 11:48:11
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Previous:From: Roderick A. AndersonDate: 2003-11-14 01:43:36
Subject: [PLUG] [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL @ (fwd)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group