Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comparing databases

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-12 04:03:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
>Ugh.  I know I might be a little more sensitive than most on this point, but it kind of begs the question why did the supporting companies fail.  Why volunteer that?

With due respect, at least two companies (pgSQL, Inc. and Command 
Prompt, Inc.) have a long standing stability within the open source
community. Actually now that I think about it, we are older than pgSQL, 
Inc. ;). Anyway I think it would be more worth stating that
their is long standing, stable companies available to support PostgreSQL 
versus the fact that PostgreSQL has survived bad VC investment (no offense).


Joshua Drake

>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com -
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - 

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-11-12 04:22:18
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-11-12 03:59:15
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group