Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM

From: Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Date: 2003-11-05 06:00:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark wrote:

>>>I'm assuming fsync syncs writes issued by other processes on the same file,
>>>which isn't necessarily true though.
>>It was already pointed out that we can't rely on that assumption.
>So the NetBSD and Sun developers I checked with both asserted fsync does in
>fact guarantee this. And SUSv2 seems to back them up:
At least Linux had one problem: fsync() syncs the inode to disk, but not 
the directory entry: if you rename a file, open it, write to it, fsync, 
and the computer crashes, then it's not guaranteed that the file rename 
is on the disk.
I think only the old ext2 is affected, not the journaling filesystems.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-11-05 06:02:48
Subject: weird regression test issue CVS HEAD
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-11-05 02:42:03
Subject: Re: Open Sourcing pgManage

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group