| From: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | AgentM <agentm(at)webopticon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Avoiding SIGPIPE (was Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-11-03 20:49:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3FA6BF68.9060303@colorfullife.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>It strikes me that sigpipe handling will be a global affair in any
>particular application --- it's unlikely that it would be correct for
>some PG connections and wrong for others. So one possibility is to make
>the control variable be global (static) and thus it could be set before
>creating the first PGconn.
>
>
What about the attached patches?
I hope I found all places that must be updated when a new function is
added to libpq.
--
Manfred
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| patch-sigpipe-global | text/plain | 5.5 KB |
| patch-pgbench-global | text/plain | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-03 21:14:47 | Re: Avoiding SIGPIPE (was Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-03 20:38:49 | Re: 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ... |