Tom Lane wrote:
>It strikes me that sigpipe handling will be a global affair in any
>particular application --- it's unlikely that it would be correct for
>some PG connections and wrong for others. So one possibility is to make
>the control variable be global (static) and thus it could be set before
>creating the first PGconn.
What about the attached patches?
I hope I found all places that must be updated when a new function is
added to libpq.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-11-03 21:14:47|
|Subject: Re: Avoiding SIGPIPE (was Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL |
|Previous:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2003-11-03 20:38:49|
|Subject: Re: 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...|