Re: Avoiding SIGPIPE (was Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL

AgentM wrote:

> That wouldn't offer a solution for people who use SIGPIPE for other
> things during the lifetime of the program (after creating the
> connection) and if a SIGPIPE handler is called due to the connection,
> the handler won't be expecting the source, and polling signal for
> state is essentially what you do now. Instead, I propose a
> PQsigpipeOK/PQacceptsigpipe/PQrecvsigpipe(PGconn*) or something to
> that effect which skips this check for the connection. That way,
> programmers are aware that the connection could call their SIGPIPE
> handler because they explicitly request it and the library remains
> backwards-compatible.

If I understand libpq sources correctly, the first packets are send
during connection setup - PQsigpipeOK(PGconn *) would be too late.
That's why I added "sigpipe=caller" as a new flag for PQconnectdb.

--
Manfred