Re: Disabling function validation

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disabling function validation
Date: 2003-10-08 14:52:25
Message-ID: 3F8424A9.1080609@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>Should we add a variable that is set from the dump filew that identifies
>>the version of PostgreSQL that generated the dump?
>> SET dumped_version = 7.3
>>
>>
>
>Is that identifying the backend version, or the pg_dump version?
>
>Without a solid rationale for this, I'd rather not do it.
>
>
>
Why not both? I would also think this info could be used in pg_restore
in some way at some point. Even if if can't, wouldn't it be worth it
just for debugging purposes. Knowing for sure what the backend and
pg_dump versions were could be helpful.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-08 14:57:31 Re: Disabling function validation
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2003-10-08 08:28:58 pgsql-server/src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib nu ...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-10-08 14:52:39 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-10-08 14:48:55 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!