Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL

From: Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>
To: Matt Christian <matt(at)summersault(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mark Stosberg <mark(at)summersault(dot)com>
Subject: Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL
Date: 2003-10-03 17:07:55
Message-ID: 3F7DACEB.8090709@future.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> The project will be ported form an existing codebase which uses Oracle
> as the backend.

As your developers have Oracle experience and are thus probably used to
take some things "logically granted", then just in case you end up with
MySQL after all you might find the following link to be a timesaver.
It's a list of MySQL's documented non-bugs.

http://sql-info.de/mysql/

Kaarel

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Hihn 2003-10-03 18:04:09 Re: Which database?
Previous Message Ryan Mahoney 2003-10-03 15:10:59 Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL