| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 10:19:00 |
| Message-ID: | 3F72C114.6010706@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> It's been brought to my attention that there is no mechanism in place to
> allow people to recognise the best or 'official' PostgreSQL interfaces,
> and I don't just mean those in the core distribution, but those that we
> consider the best of their type such a psqlODBC, libpqxx, Npgsql and so
> on.
>
> Obviously we can list them on a webpage, but what criteria could we use
> to select them?
We should probably start with the commonly used interfaces and have a
note on the page asking people to advise us of the others. Then we
should email the link to the pgsql-general mailing list and people there
will suggest most of the things we've otherwise missed.
Hope that helps.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> Any thoughts/comments/ideas?
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-25 11:42:36 | Re: 'Official' Interfaces |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-09-25 07:50:02 | 'Official' Interfaces |