Re: PL/pgSQL functions - text / varchar - havy performance

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL functions - text / varchar - havy performance
Date: 2003-08-29 15:34:13
Message-ID: 3F4F7275.5030203@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 10:46:44AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>
>>Postgres has to convert the text to a varchar before it can actually
>>do anything. It's possible (though I'm not sure) that it has to
>>do the conversion with each record it looks at.
>
> It does? According to the docs, varchar is just syntactic sugar for
> text. In fact, text and varchar() are supposed to be exactly the
> same.

Really? Well, if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.

Have any explanation as to why that function is so slow?

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-08-29 15:54:01 Re: PL/pgSQL functions - text / varchar - havy performance
Previous Message Alexander Priem 2003-08-29 15:13:52 Re: Indexing question