Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>,"Advocacy (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-08-29 00:50:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 22:46:58 -0700,
>   Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>>That's an interesting observation, because I've long thought PeopleSoft 
>>ought to support Postgres too. From what I recall, their database schema 
>>is *very* database neutral (at least as of PSFT version 7.x) and fairly 
>>simple (we ran it on MSSQL 6.5). It would probably be pretty easily 
>>ported to run on Postgres.
> In my opinion it is too database agnostic. They pretty much just use the
> DB as a file. From what I have seen of the system it is one big hack.

Yeah, I didn't say I *liked* their schema, just that I thought it would 
be easy for them to support Postgres ;-)

Like it or not, they are one of the larger ERP/CRM players (after the 
merger with JDEwards, they will be *ahead* of Oracle, only second to 
SAP), and having them offer PostgreSQL support would be significant. If 
the XA/Tuxedo thing is an issue, they could position it for mid-tier 
customers who don't need the transaction manager anyway.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David SchultzDate: 2003-08-29 00:51:12
Subject: Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...
Previous:From: Bruce BadgerDate: 2003-08-29 00:40:24
Subject: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2003-08-29 03:12:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit
Previous:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2003-08-28 23:21:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group