Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: "Advocacy (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-08-28 05:46:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
(moving to advocacy)

Christopher Browne wrote:
> - The main Tuxedo reseller that I am aware of is PeopleSoft, who use
> it for their "high traffic" clients.  Anyone that has seen news lately
> knows that they and Oracle aren't exactly "best pals" these days;
> having another DB option could be helpful to them...

That's an interesting observation, because I've long thought PeopleSoft 
ought to support Postgres too. From what I recall, their database schema 
is *very* database neutral (at least as of PSFT version 7.x) and fairly 
simple (we ran it on MSSQL 6.5). It would probably be pretty easily 
ported to run on Postgres.

I wonder how we could get them to consider it...


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodaiDate: 2003-08-28 06:23:51
Subject: Weird constraint output
Previous:From: Dennis BjörklundDate: 2003-08-28 05:07:14
Subject: Re: Date input changed in 7.4 ?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: いま、欲しいは「3億円」と「保証」のどちら!それとも両方。Date: 2003-08-28 06:06:11
Subject: 未承諾広告*個人でー2億・3億・5億9千万円収入者続出ー信じられないー証拠確認迎
Previous:From: Roderick A. AndersonDate: 2003-08-28 05:33:44
Subject: Re: ads on broken

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group