Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, hcarle(at)afilias(dot)info,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Date: 2003-08-13 03:10:06
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
>>>>INSERT CITY/STATE - August xx, 2003 -
>>>Can you give me a suggestion about this for the 7.4 release?  PostgreSQL isn't
>>>located anywhere in particular.   But if we omit the city and state, some
>>>news agencies will fill in TORONTO, CANADA on their own, furthering the
>>>confusion between us and PostgreSQL Inc.

Given that this is a global project, we should be able to use *any* 
city, right? So why not Redwood Shores, CA? ;-)


In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2003-08-13 03:19:18
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-08-13 03:00:57
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group