Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, hcarle(at)afilias(dot)info, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Date: 2003-08-13 03:10:06
Message-ID: 3F39AC0E.6060403@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

>>>>INSERT CITY/STATE - August xx, 2003 -
>>>
>>>Can you give me a suggestion about this for the 7.4 release? PostgreSQL isn't
>>>located anywhere in particular. But if we omit the city and state, some
>>>news agencies will fill in TORONTO, CANADA on their own, furthering the
>>>confusion between us and PostgreSQL Inc.

Given that this is a global project, we should be able to use *any*
city, right? So why not Redwood Shores, CA? ;-)

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-08-13 03:19:18 Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-13 03:00:57 Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written