From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: followup on previous |
Date: | 2003-07-31 12:39:21 |
Message-ID: | 3F290DF9.20008@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
We wouldn't like to have it called Ingres too...
Spoken language is different from written, so docs should be precise.
PostgreSQL is a mark, and should be used as careful as it deserves.
Regards,
Andreas
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>I just seem to recall a discussion where we decided to 'standardise' on
>PostgreSQL...I'm not fussed tho.
>
>Chris
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
>To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
>Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:53 PM
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] followup on previous
>
>
>
>
>>Thomas liked Postgres rather than PostgreSQL in the docs, and I think
>>that's where it came from. I use Postgres in speaking, and PostgreSQL
>>in writing, so I guess either is OK.
>>
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-07-31 13:43:21 | Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |
Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2003-07-31 10:38:23 | Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |