Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>Included in the patch, I changed SQL language functions so that they
>>could be declared with and use polymorphic types.
> I'm not convinced that will work ... in particular, does the parsetree
> get fixed correctly when a SQL function is inlined?
I'll try it out. What's the easiest way to be sure the function get's
In any case, it's easy enough to rip that part out of the patch -- it
just would have been a lot more painful to test without it.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2003-06-29 22:56:27|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PlPython|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-06-29 22:29:18|
|Subject: Re: Question about array read using protocol 3.0 implementation in C# |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2003-06-30 01:01:53|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-06-29 21:24:53|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support |