| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | [Fwd: Question] |
| Date: | 2003-04-24 01:54:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3EA743C4.3010105@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi guys,
Does anyone have the inclination to talk to these guys?
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Question
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:49:21 -0400
From: CGSI Inc. - GCIS Inc. <info(at)cgsi(dot)ca>
Reply-To: <info(at)cgsi(dot)ca>
Organization: Le Centre General des Services Internet Inc.
To: <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
CC: <info(at)gcis(dot)ca>
**
**
**
*Hello. We are considering using Postgre SQL over SQL server. We need
the trigger*
*capability. However, I am told by a few programmers that Postgre
operated slower*
*than say SQL server or other database solutions in the same category.*
**
*First, is there any thruth to this? If it is so, how could you
explain that? What are*
*the remedies?*
* *
*
(We are assuming that all platforms run on all the same servers, hence
have access*
*to all the same amount of memory and processing power).*
*** *
*Thank you for your answer*
*** *
*Serge Thibodeau,*
*GCIS Inc.*
*sthibodeau(at)gcis(dot)ca <mailto:sthibodeau(at)gcis(dot)ca>*
*** *
*** *
*_________________________________________*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-04-24 02:31:23 | [Fwd: HP World 2003 Call For Papers] |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-04-24 01:31:14 | Re: Slashdot article -OSNews |