Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Documentation in book length

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Date: 2003-01-02 23:12:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I know one possible objection is that it takes too long to build the
> complete documentation set.  But you can do an SGML syntax check that
> takes a few seconds on modern machines and catches most mistakes.

That sounds great. How to you do the SGML syntax check?

> Compared to making the documentation easier to use and more "marketable" I
> think this is a price we have to pay.
> Thoughts?

Making the docs into one book should also allow better hyperlink 
cross-referencing. That will be a welcome improvement.


In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-01-02 23:32:07
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-01-02 23:08:49
Subject: Documentation in book length

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group