Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: small dblink patch

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small dblink patch
Date: 2002-05-27 21:45:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
 > This isn't going to fix the problem --- all the functions are still
 > declared to take type NAME, which will not be long enough for
 > qualified names.  You need to replace the use of NAME with use of
 > TEXT.

 > I don't particularly care for that answer.  Would instead suggest you
 > borrow the coding now being used in sequence.c and other places where
 > text arguments are interpreted as relation names:

OK - this patch is a bit larger -- followed your advise, and moved 
internal declarations from dblink.h to dblink.c while I was at it.

Please apply if there are no more objections.



Attachment: dblink.2002.05.27.1.patch
Description: text/plain (19.4 KB)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bear GilesDate: 2002-05-27 21:47:59
Subject: Re: SSL (patch 2)
Previous:From: Bear GilesDate: 2002-05-27 21:33:45
Subject: Re: SSL (patch 1)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group