Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Of course, we would review any patch before application. I guess the
> full path is:
> o Do we want this feature?
> o How do we want the feature to behave?
> o How do we want the feature implemented?
> o Submit patch
> o Review patch
> o Apply patch
> I assume your point is that people shouldn't send in big patches
> without going through the discussion first. Yes, that is ideal, but if
> they don't, we just discuss it after the patch appears, and then decide
> if we want to apply it or ask for modifications.
For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
Is there any consensus on it ?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2002-04-16 02:02:10|
|Subject: Re: Operators and schemas |
|Previous:||From: Curt Sampson||Date: 2002-04-16 01:53:49|
|Subject: Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2002-04-16 02:45:59|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-04-16 01:37:12|
|Subject: Re: YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch |