Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Domain Support -- another round

From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Domain Support -- another round
Date: 2002-03-20 20:58:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Arrays.  I don't much care for the fact that arrays of domain-type
> values aren't supported.  The handling of domains that are themselves
> arrays seems a tad odd as well: the array-ish nature of the domain is
> exposed, which doesn't make a lot of sense to me.  Perhaps we'd be
> better off to forbid array domains.

From SQL99 11.23 Syntax Rule 6)

"<data type> should not specify a reference type, user-defined type,
or an array type."

Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-03-20 21:10:14
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Notify argument?
Previous:From: Igor KovalenkoDate: 2002-03-20 20:33:52
Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-21 02:46:54
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] JDBC Connection startup cleaned up
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-03-20 20:25:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group