Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Colin Faber <cfaber(at)fpsn(dot)net>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??
Date: 2002-02-26 18:09:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heh Heh Heh

How about PostgreSQL Server 11.0 Enterprise Edition?


Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> Agreed.
> > For PostgreSQL to achieve its real potential, the game must be played.
> Hmm. Would "PostgreSQL version (Oracle + 1)i" be too transparent? ;)
>                   - Thomas
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
   - Indira Gandhi

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-26 18:13:30
Subject: Re: quotes in SET grammar
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-26 18:05:37
Subject: Re: COPY FROM is not 8bit clean

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group