Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > Does this change also affect the SIGTERM handling
> > (not only query-cancel) ?
> Yes. Cancel and die interrupts are accepted at the same places.
Cancel interrupts are accepted at CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS
or while waiting for a lock.
Die interrupts are accepted at CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS or
at the time when they are received while interrupts
are allowed. Is my understanding right ? If so, isn't
it strange ?
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: momjian||Date: 2002-01-05 04:03:47|
|Subject: pgsql/doc TODO|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-01-05 03:24:47|
|Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/tcop/postgres.c include/misc ... |