Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"
Date: 2001-08-01 03:51:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, it seems to me that there are a number of places this can be taken
> > then:
> >

Honestly, I don't understand what "Unison" means.
What spec is preferable for the command ?

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Steve HoweDate: 2001-08-01 05:20:23
Subject: Re: LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-08-01 01:25:54
Subject: Re: vacuumlo.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-08-01 04:12:50
Subject: Re: contrib/postgis
Previous:From: Timothy H. KeittDate: 2001-08-01 02:40:51
Subject: Re: Fuzzy matching?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group