| From: | Horak Daniel <horak(at)mmp(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Thomas G(dot) Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success |
| Date: | 1998-10-09 11:15:01 |
| Message-ID: | 3B4047E8AA18D211BBFA00A024B252C008758E@exchange.mmp.plzen-city.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Most of us aren't NT propellerheads, but now that a port might be
> available I'm sure the mailing lists will get more folks who
> are. Then a
> tremendous step forward such as you've take will be greeted with more
> enthusiasm :)
My primary development is Linux/i386 but NT with Cugwin is almost Unix -
command line utilities, gcc, ... And the clients want M$...
> > - many other tests failed due to not having the dynamicly
> loaded code
> > in DLLs
>
> Is DLL support so different that it will never work, or have
> you not had
> time to look at it?
It is only not so simple to create shared library in Cygwin as in Linux.
There are some makefiles that creates DLL "automagicly". It needs 5
step, 2 or 3 temporary files but it possible... There can be "DLL in
Cygwin" gurus ...
Dan Horak
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Horak Daniel | 1998-10-09 11:29:05 | RE: [HACKERS] NT port of PGSQL - success] |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1998-10-09 10:05:48 | Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success) |