| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "'Jean-Michel POURE'" <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Access '97 {oj ...} Left Join |
| Date: | 2001-04-11 10:41:59 |
| Message-ID: | 3AD434F7.8E830588@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
"Henshall, Stuart - WCP" wrote:
>
> Oh, that explains it :)
> As a quick query why does the ODBC driver report them as available? As this
> information is normally used by programs to determine if outer joins can be
> used then surely they should be reported as not working, IMHO (I'm guessing
> that humans read the docs to find a db's features). If this where the case
> then IIRC Access '97 would use its own method of performing the join (which
> is inefficient, but works).
It seems you are right.
I would change the driver report after the release of
7.1. Or hopefully I may be able to implement the {oj
functionality.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2001-04-11 18:27:52 | ODBC Driver Installer |
| Previous Message | Cedar Cox | 2001-04-11 09:14:52 | Re: Insalling the ODBC driver on Windows |